Current Affairs, Movies, Life Style, Auto-motives...

Facebook
RSS

Germans recover Stuka bomber wreck from Baltic Sea

BERLIN  — German military divers are working to hoist the wreck of a Stuka dive bomber from the floor of the Baltic Sea, a rare example of the plane that once wreaked havoc over Europe as part of the Nazis' war machine.

The single-engine monoplane carried sirens that produced a distinctive and terrifying screaming sound as it dove vertically to release its bombs or strafe targets with its machine guns. There are only two complete Stukas still around.

The Stuka wreck, first discovered in the 1990s when a fisherman's nets snagged on it, lies about 10 kilometers (6 miles) off the coast of the German Baltic island of Ruegen, in about 18 meters (60 feet) of water.

The divers have been working over the past week to prepare the bomber to be hoisted to the surface, using fire hoses to carefully free it from the sand. They have already brought up smaller pieces and also hauled up its motor over the weekend.

They are now working to free the main 9-meter (30-foot) fuselage piece and expect to bring it up on Tuesday, depending on the weather, said Capt. Sebastian Bangert, a spokesman from the German Military Historical Museum in Dresden, which is running the recovery operation.

Initial reports are that it is in good condition despite having spent the last seven decades at the bottom of the sea, he said.

"From my perspective there's a lot of damage — it's been under water for 70 years — but our restoration crew says it's in really good condition for being restored," said Bangert, speaking from the deck of the Navy ship being used for the operation. "That's our goal — a complete restoration and not conservation as a wreck."

So far, little is known about this particular plane — when it crashed, who its pilot and gunner were and whether they survived the crash, Bangert said. Once the plane is brought to the surface, researchers will use the serial number to track down all of the information.

The Junkers JU87 — known by most as the Stuka, which is short for the German word for dive bomber 'Sturzkampfflugzeug" — first saw service in the 1936-1939 Spanish Civil War, being sent by Hitler to help the fascists.

The only two known complete Stukas are on display at the Royal Air Force Museum in London and at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago. Both are later models. Bangert said from the motor, the one just found is also likely a later model "JU87D."

Still, to find such a complete example is "terrific," said Andrew Simpson, curator of the aircraft collection at the RAF Museum.

"You are still talking about less than a dozen in the world, even if you include every back end and center section found on the Russian steppes," he said. "Any Stuka is good."

Following its service in Spain, Stukas fired the first shots of World War II, dropping Nazi bombs on the Polish town of Wielun on Sept. 1, 1939, killing some 1,200 civilians in what is considered one of the first terror bombings in history.

German ace Hans-Ulrich Rudel claimed to have destroyed more than 500 tanks, mostly on the Eastern Front, and several ships including a Soviet battleship, primarily in the Stuka.

The Stuka was used throughout the World War II, but for all its successes in the early days on the Western Front and in the later invasion of the Soviet Union, the aircraft was later overmatched by quicker and more maneuverable Allied fighter planes.

As museum pieces today, they're a big draw for visitors and also important for researchers and historians, said Kathleen McCarthy, director of collections at Chicago's Museum of Science and Industry, whose Stuka had been shot down over Libya in the last year of the war.

"The discovery and raising of a third Stuka from the sea floor will be a great asset for both scholars and the general public interested in learning more about historic military technology as well as this critical period in our world history," she said.

The German Military Historical Museum plans to eventually display the Stuka at its Air Force Museum, located at the former Gatow airport in Berlin.
[ Read More ]

Henry Thomas on ‘E.T.’ 30 years later and his new role as Hank Williams




Thirty years ago today, "E.T." opened in theaters nationwide and eventually broke box office records, earning $435 million. In honor of the film's 30th anniversary, Yahoo! Movies caught up with the human star of "E.T." Henry Thomas, who played the curious, red-hoodie-wearing young Elliot.

To our surprise, Thomas admitted the enduring impact of the '80s blockbuster film, directed by Steven Spielberg, is only now hitting him.

Now 40, married, and a father of three, Thomas spoke candidly of his place in cinematic history, his admiration of Spielberg -- and other legendary directors he has worked with -- and his starring role in the upcoming film "The Last Ride" (in theaters June 22) -- about the last days of post-war era country music legend Hank Williams Sr., who died at the age of 29.

Meriah Doty: Since you play a country music legend in "The Last Ride," I'm curious: Are you country music fan?

Henry Thomas: I have been by proxy. I grew up in a rural South Texas community so I heard a lot of Texas music growing up. There's a soft spot in my heart for some old '60s and '70s country, but I'm not a big fan of the big commercial country music in any way, shape or form. I really like that kind of bluegrass, old-time music that Hank Williams' music came out of.


MD: How much did you know about Hank Williams when you took on the role and how much did you have to research?

HT: I knew a bit about Hank Williams -- like everybody knows a little bit about Hank Williams I suppose. The research that I did was in a large part medical because I really wanted to understand what it would be like to have spina bifida, and also what it feels like to be on morphine and alcohol at the same time -- which I decided not to do a physical experiment with. Color me crazy. [laughs] There are a lot of myths surrounding him and there's a lot of footage that you can look at to get an idea of how he moved. My research beyond the script is usually only as much as I feel I need and I felt like this character was already about 80 percent there on the page. It was just kind of confining him into a form that resembled Hank Williams enough that it didn't deter audience members.

MD: You depict him at a time of his life when he's sick. It's clearly a dark time in his life. Did you find it personally difficult to take that on when you were shooting?

HT: Yeah, it wears on you after a while. Playing dark moments or dark places in people's lives. You certainly take your work home with you a little bit. There's also a great wealth of humor. I think the real Hank Williams -- he had a real sense of humor. You could tell from his song writing and everything. In this piece, I really enjoyed playing the comic moments of it just because you need that kind of levity.


MD: In playing Hank Williams Sr. what was the biggest thing you learned?

HT: When you make something like this and there's never enough time, it amazes me when young actors step up and really do good work and I think that Jesse James [Thomas' co-star] really helped me go to work every day and do good work. All the interiors we shot inside the car -- we did that all in the space of one day. We shot something like 19 pages [of the script] in one day because it was all just blocked off and they basically changed the [camera] angles slightly and we had pages and pages of dialogue. So it became kind of like a play. I think in an environment where people hardly ever rehearse anymore, those days stand out. I'm really proud of our performances in the film just because I know what kind of pressures we were under to pull through. When you have somebody like Jesse, who was, I'd say 20, when we were doing this, it's great. It's nice to see the young folks are still doing good work these days.




MD: Well, you have my segue wrapped in a neat bow: Speaking of young actors... 30 years later, how do you think of "E.T." now? -- just the enormity of that movie and your part in it?

HT: It certainly wasn't something that I ever thought I'd be talking about 30 years from then. It's funny because I think it's just now starting to hit me how hugely successful it was and what a big deal it was.


MD: Wow, really?

HT: To a certain extent you feel like you're just kind of caught up in some after effect of a marketing strategy. But then you kind of realize the supply is there because there's a demand. People still really respond to this film. Now it's odd because I have people who are younger than I am saying how exciting that film was for them... It's the first film they remember seeing with their parents. So it makes you feel good to be associated with something that people still remember.


MD: In working with Steven Spielberg, is there anything you took away that has endured over the years?

HT: Of all of the great directors that I've worked with, they all share a common trait -- you see it across the board. Spielberg was probably the most enthusiastic guy to watch off camera when the take was being filmed because he was so caught up in the film, really excited about it all the time. That level of enthusiasm for it and the passion is something that not everybody has. Whatever his achievements, whatever he's done, I think at heart the reason he's successful and the reason he continues to make films is to satisfy that enthusiasm. He has a real genuine love for film. I think all those guys do -- Scorsese does for sure, Milos Foreman for sure, yeah.

MD: What can we expect from you in the future?

HT: Stay alive. [laughs] I've decided as an actor, the level that I work at, I really don't have much control over my career. I kind of have to take it as it comes. I have parameters that I work under, but for the most part I just don't worry about it. As long as my kids are not screaming at me for food, I'm pretty okay. [laughs] I can survive.





[ Read More ]

CM orders Nityananda's ashram to be kept 'under lock'




Bangalore, June 11  The Karnataka government Monday ordered locking up the ashram near here of controversial Hindu religious guru Nityananda Swami following fresh allegations of sexual exploitation of women against him.

"I have ordered that the ashram be kept under lock," Chief Minister D.V. Sadananda Gowda told reporters. The move came in the wake of increasing demand for its closure.

Gowda said legal steps would be taken to get the bail of Nityananda cancelled, to arrest him if necessary.

Nityananda, who is already facing rape charges, has been on bail since June 2010 after he was arrested from Solan in Himachal Pradesh. He went into hiding in Solan for about a month in March-April 2010 after a Tamil TV channel aired a video purportedly showing him indulging in sexual acts.

After being picked by Karnataka Police he was in a Bangalore for seven weeks.

The whereabouts of 32-year-old Nityananda are not known since last Friday. He has been out of the ashram spread over a 29-acre plot in Bidadi, about 35 km from here.

The latest trouble for the controversial religious leader began after a Kannada TV channel started telecasting complaints by several women that they were sexually exploited by him.

The Congress, the Janata Dal-Secular as well as several Kannada groups have been for the last three days demanding immediate closure of the ashram and action against Nityananda.

The ashram saw fracas between media personnel and disciples of Nityananda last Thursday and Friday. On Thursday, Nityananda asked a reporter to go out for asking inconvenient questions, leading to protests. The next day, the press meet called by his disciples also ended in chaos.
[ Read More ]

Guess the next winner is Formula One's new game




LONDON  - Even commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone, whose ideal Formula One season would be decided at the very last corner, could hardly have dreamed of a championship like this one.

 With just over a third of the distance gone, and an unprecedented seven different winners from the first seven races, the ultimate winner of the 2012 driver's crown is anyone's guess.

 Even calling the winner of the next race in Valencia is tough, with two of the six world champions on the grid - Kimi Raikkonen and Michael Schumacher - yet to win in this most unpredictable of seasons.

 A mere three points separate the top three in the championship standings with the top five split by less than the 25 for a win and 13 races remaining.

 "It's absolutely wide open. It's a dream for the sport," declared America's former champion Mario Andretti after McLaren's Lewis Hamilton won in Canada on Sunday.

 "Formula One for so many years has been quite predictable...that's out of the window now. Somewhere the rules are working, something is working. So don't fix it," he told Sky Sports television.

 Just when a team believe they have cracked the code, the Pirelli tyres make them think again.

 "This is what is going to be normal for the season," Hamilton told reporters after being joined by Lotus driver Romain Grosjean and Sauber's Mexican Sergio Perez on the podium.

 "That's just my feeling, but then again my guess is as good as yours...we're still trying to fully understand these tyres.

 "Sometimes you're overheating them, sometimes you're not heating them up enough. We don't understand why sometimes a Lotus is quicker than us, or a Mercedes is quicker than us and then we're quicker than them another time.

 "But I think it's great for Formula One, it's great for the fans to see," said the 2008 champion, while adding that seven was now quite enough different winners.

 BETTER HANDLE

 After watching his double world champion Sebastian Vettel qualify on pole position for the second year running in Montreal, Red Bull team principal Christian Horner sounded confident enough.

 "I feel the Red Bull technical team are doing a great job to try and understand the new regulations," he said. "We are starting to get a better handle on what these tyres like."

 On Sunday, with Vettel finishing fourth after a late stop forced on him by tyre wear, there was less optimism: "Perhaps we were just a little bit too hard on the tyres," said the Briton.

 The problem for teams and drivers has been finding the balance that allows them to extract the most from the tyres.

 Sunday was ultimately a battle between one-stoppers and two-stoppers, with McLaren getting it right for Hamilton with a second stop while Ferrari kept Fernando Alonso on one and paid the price.

 But it goes further than that. Grosjean and Perez did just one stop each but were able to reel in Alonso's Ferrari on tyres that still had plenty of life in them.

 "We could be really smart here today and say that they messed the strategy up, Ferrari and Red Bull," said McLaren's sporting director Sam Michael.

 "But if you look at Lotus and Sauber, they made that strategy work. I think that one of those cars had tyres that were over 45 laps old."

 Track temperatures play a big part in the equation, as do driving styles and the timing of the stops. But Pirelli are still keeping everyone on their toes.

 "I think it's good. The fact that you have to manage your car and your tyres is part of being a race car driver," said Canada's outspoken 1997 champion Jacques Villeneuve.

 "The problem is that when they (the tyres) do give up, it's too sudden, too strong, too much of a give up. The drivers feel that the tyres are still OK so they stay out and the team make the decision to try and make it work.

 "But instead of losing a second a lap, they then lose four or five seconds a lap. That is wrong. You used to get four or five laps to figure out whether it is going off too much, now you get half a lap."

 Ferrari had a brief window of opportunity, maybe one lap, where they could have pitted Alonso for a second time and kept Hamilton covered. Instead, perhaps reassured by the Spaniard feeling that his tyres were holding up, they took a gamble.

 It failed but nobody could say they were entirely sure they had got it right.

 "There were times in that race where you wondered have we got it right, are their tyres going to last? All our analysis told us we were doing the right thing but until it unfolds you are never quite sure," sid McLaren boss Martin Whitmarsh.
[ Read More ]

Only wildcard can revive Sania's Olympic hopes




New Delhi, June 11  Sania Mirza failed to protect her top 10 ranking in doubles, slipping to 12 in the latest Women's Tennis Association (WTA) charts released Monday, and that leaves her with no choice but to get a wild card if she has to play at the London Olympics.

Monday was the cut-off day set by the International Tennis Federation (ITF) for direct qualification on the basis of the rankings after the French Open. The top-10 in doubles in both the men and women's category earn a direct qualification.

Among men, Leander Paes is the only Indian to qualify for a direct entry in the doubles as he retained his seventh position in the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) rankings after the French Open.

The AITA selection committee comprising Jaideep Mukherjea, S.P. Misra, Rohit Rajpal, Zeeshan Ali and Sai Jayalakshmi along with two government nominees will decide Friday, who between Rohan Bopanna (World No.12) and Mahesh Bhupathi (World No.13) will partner Paes.

With Sania failing to make it on the strength of her ranking, the All India Tennis Association (AITA) is trying hard for a wildcard for her. Paraguay's Veronica Cepede Royg and Liechenstein's Stephanie Vogt have been offered two of the four wild cards.

AITA selector S.P. Misra told IANS that since Sania dropped out of top 10 only a wildcard can determine her hopes at the London Games.

"A wildcard can only help her get an entry into the singles and doubles for Olympics. In doubles, she can propose her doubles partner but the AITA selection committee will finally decide the combination," said Misra.

Sania's second Grand Slam title with Bhupathi and the first at the French Open has made sure the pair is India's best bet at the Games, but Paes is still the front-runner to team up with her in London.

The AITA will announce the team June 15 as ITF has set June 21 as the deadline to confirm the entry of eligible players for the Games.
[ Read More ]

India could be 1st BRIC to lose investment grade: S&P




MUMBAI  - Standard & Poor's said on Monday that India could become the first of the so-called BRIC economies to lose its investment-grade status, less than two months after cutting its rating outlook for the country.

 Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee rejected the rating agency's report, saying there would be a turnaround in India's "growth prospects in the coming months", according to a government statement.

 "Pranab Mukherjee said that the Foreign Institutional Investors (FII) have reposed faith in the Indian economy and had already poured in $12 billion in the first five months of the current calender year..." the statement added. "This is the highest net FII inflow in the last five years for the corresponding period."

 The S&P report sent the rupee and stocks lower, but analyst Takahira Ogawa said "nothing has changed" from April, when the agency downgraded the outlook on India's credit rating.

 "We are simply providing further explanation of our views on India sovereign," he said in an emailed response to Reuters.

 India's sovereign rating is BBB minus, the lowest investment grade rating. In April, S&P lowered its outlook on the rating for Asia's third-largest economy to negative from stable.

 "Slowing GDP growth and political roadblocks to economic policymaking are just some of the factors pushing up the risk that India could lose its investment-grade rating," S&P said in a statement on Monday but dated June 8.

 The report is titled: "Will India Be The First BRIC Fallen Angel?"

 Indian stocks fell into negative territory after the S&P statement, while the rupee skidded to as much as 55.82 to the dollar, a near one-week low, from 55.45 earlier.

 The benchmark 10-year bond yield rose 2 basis points after the statement was released. Traders said the bond markets were not greatly affected because offshore investors hold a small share of the market.

 Kumar Rachapudi, fixed income strategist at Barclays Capital in Singapore, said the moves in the rupiah and bonds may not have been warranted in response to the S&P news.

 "While the report is new, the content in itself is probably not," the strategist said. "The discussion in this report has largely been covered in their previous report when S&P revised the outlook in April."

 The latest report comes after India posted March quarter annual growth of 5.3 percent, its weakest pace in nine years and far below expectations.

 "Setbacks or reversals in India's path toward a more liberal economy could hurt its long-term growth prospects and, therefore, its credit quality," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Joydeep Mukerji.

 The so-called BRIC economies consist of Brazil, Russia, India and China. India has the lowest S&P rating of all the BRIC countries, and is the only one with a negative outlook from the rating agency, it said in the report.

 While India's credit rating is under pressure for a downgrade, fast-rising emerging market Indonesia is on the up and has just joined the ranks of investment-grade nations. Many see it as the new "I" in the BRIC acronym.

 "The combination of a weakening political context for further reform, along with economic deceleration, raises the risk that the government may take modest steps backward away from economic liberalization in the event of unexpected economic shocks," Mukerji said in S&P's Monday statement.

 The government's inability to push through reforms is widely blamed for yawning current account and fiscal deficits that have driven the rupee to a record low against the dollar. In addition to slowing growth, India is plagued by persistently high inflation.

 "S&P's warning clearly highlights the challenge facing the Indian economy, which has been crippled by the complete dysfunctionality of the government machinery," said Upasna Bharadwaj, economist at ING Vysya Bank in Mumbai.
[ Read More ]